ABOUT US
Confluence Policy & Strategy Group
When the problem is too consequential for a standard process.
Confluence PSG is a policy and strategy firm built around a single conviction: that the most consequential problems facing government, communities, and institutions are not unsolvable. They are unresolved because the processes designed to address them have not been up to the task.
The firm’s core methodology is the Collaborative Decision Making Process (CDMP), a structured framework developed over more than fifty work groups, task forces, and multi-stakeholder engagements. The CDMP is not generic facilitation. It is a deliberate sequence that addresses the reasons high-stakes processes typically fail: participants are put in the wrong order, trust is assumed rather than built, problems are defined too late, and negotiations happen over positions rather than language. Working through that sequence is why a room that voted against something one week can vote with a super-majority in support on the same question the following week. It is why parties who have been in direct opposition for years can reach unanimous agreement on a framework neither of them would have written alone.
The documented public record reflects what that methodology produces. An AI governance framework, after three failed legislative attempts, passed overwhelmingly and was signed into law thirteen days after introduction. A major system’s transit governance reform, gridlocked for years and a process that produced 31 recommendations, now codified in legislation. A committee examining a criminal justice commission that was sunsetting after twenty years reached broad consensus on a new structure, charge and composition. More than 1,100 educators surveyed produced findings that contradicted all available prior data and reframed what state action was actually required. Fifty-eight disability rights recommendations were published after coordinating four simultaneous subcommittees across a politically diverse set of interests.
The practice spans civil rights, education, criminal justice, transportation, public safety, housing, healthcare, workforce development, and strategic planning. The breadth is not incidental. The cross-domain perspective that comes from working across all of these areas simultaneously is one of the firm’s most concrete advantages in any single room.
Confluence PSG operates as a fee-for-service firm. For foundations, family offices, and partners who prefer to work through a nonprofit structure, Confluence Policy Center is available as a 501(c)(3) vehicle to support convenings and collaborative initiatives aligned with shared priorities.
State Government
Confluence has served as process architect and neutral facilitator for Governor-convened working groups, legislatively created task forces, and state agency strategic planning at the highest levels of state government. The work ranges from multi-stakeholder policy frameworks signed into law to multi-year agency strategic plans built through genuine staff and leadership engagement. State leaders bring Confluence in when the problem is too complex, too contentious, or too consequential to hand to a standard contractor, and when the outcome needs to hold after the process closes.
Local Government
City and county leaders face the same dynamics as state government in compressed form: competing constituencies, limited resources, and decisions that have to hold across a politically diverse community. Confluence has helped local leaders build regional consensus on housing, navigate transportation funding, establish budget priorities through structured community engagement, and design strategic plans that staff will actually implement. The work is grounded in the specific political realities of each community, not in frameworks imported from outside.
Public-Private Partnerships
Government and private sector leaders often need each other and distrust each other in equal measure. Confluence has the credibility on both sides to convene those rooms and the process discipline to produce agreements that each party can defend to its own constituency. Engagements have spanned economic development, workforce, education, transportation, housing, and technology governance.
Regional & Multi-Jurisdictional
Some problems do not stop at city or county lines. Confluence has designed and facilitated collaborative processes among municipalities, counties, regional bodies, and state agencies on issues where no single jurisdiction has the authority or the resources to act alone. The challenge in these rooms is not only reaching agreement. It is reaching agreement in a form that each participating jurisdiction can implement within its own governance structure.
Community, Non-Profit & NGO
Community organizations, advocacy groups, and nonprofits are often the most important voices in a collaborative process and the most likely to feel the process was designed without them in mind. Confluence designs processes where these voices shape outcomes rather than merely inform them. Several of the firm's most significant engagements have been anchored by community and nonprofit leadership rather than government conveners.
Multi-Stakeholder Coalitions
A task force that produces recommendations and then dissolves has done half the job. Confluence helps clients design coalitions and bodies with the structure, membership, and operating norms to sustain the work after the initial process closes. The Colorado AI governance framework was held after passage by a coalition that included the ACLU, the Colorado Cross-Disability Coalition, the Colorado Chamber of Commerce, and Google. That coalition did not form by accident. It was designed.
CONTACT INFO
- CO | NC | FL | National
- 303.551.6989
- 910.239.8740
- inquiry@confluencepsg.com